Article:Essential Oils as Repellents against Arthropods (6189689)

From ScienceSource
Jump to: navigation, search

This page is the ScienceSource HTML version of the scholarly article described at Its title is Essential Oils as Repellents against Arthropods and the publication date was 2018-10-02. The initial author is Mi Young Lee.

Fuller metadata can be found in the Wikidata link, which lists all authors, and may have detailed items for some or all of them. There is further information on the article in the footer below. This page is a reference version, and is protected against editing.

Converted JATS paper:

Journal Information

Title: BioMed Research International

Essential Oils as Repellents against Arthropods

  • Mi Young Lee

Department of Medical Biotechnology, Soonchunhyang University, 22 Soonchunhyang–ro, Asan, Chungnam 31537, Republic of Korea

Publication date (collection): /2018

Publication date (epub): 10/2018


The development of effective and safe repellents against arthropods is very important, because there are no effective vaccines against arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) and parasites. Arboviruses and parasites are transmitted to humans from arthropods, and mosquitoes are the most common arthropods associated with dengue, malaria, and yellow fever. Enormous efforts have been made to develop effective repellents against arthropods, and thus far synthetic repellents have been widely used. However, the use of synthetic repellents has raised several concerns in terms of environmental and human health risks and safety. Thus, plant essential oils (EOs) have been widely used as an alternative to synthetic repellents. In this review, we briefly introduce and summarize recent studies that have investigated EOs as insect repellents. Current technology and research trends to develop effective and safe repellents from plant EOs are also described in this review.


1. Introduction

Arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) are a public health concern worldwide owing to their association with several neglected tropical diseases [[1], [2]]. Thus, the discovery and development of effective and safe therapeutics against arboviruses remain a continuous goal. Arboviruses are transmitted to humans from arthropods and are categorized into several genera, including flaviviruses. Flaviviruses include yellow fever virus (YFV), West Nile virus (WNV), Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV), Zika virus (ZIKV), and dengue virus (DENV) [[3]]. Aedes aegypti L. is the primary known vector of some viruses such as the dengue, yellow fever, chikungunya, and Zika viruses [[4][6]]. Other arthropods such as ticks, midges, flies, and fleas are also involved in the transmission of these viruses to humans [[7], [8]]. The most common mosquito-borne infectious disease in the United States today is caused by the West Nile virus (WNV), an arbovirus transmitted to humans by Culicine mosquitoes [[9], [10]]. There were 2,002 reported cases of WNV infections and 121 deaths across the US in 2017, according to the Center for Disease Control (CDC). However, there are no vaccines to prevent or medications to treat WNV. Dengue fever is by far the most rapidly expanding mosquito-borne viral disease, with an approximately 30 times increase worldwide in recent decades [[11]]. Approximately 40% of the population is at risk of infection, 50–528 million people are infected, and around 10,000–20,000 people die annually due to dengue [[12], [13]]. Ticks transmit Lyme disease, which is very common in the United States and Europe. Approximately 300,000 people per year in the United States and 65,000 people per year in Europe are affected by tick-associated Lyme disease according to the CDC [[14], [15]].

Unfortunately, however, there are no effective vaccines against these viruses and no specific drugs for inhibiting their propagation. As a consequence, controlling the spread of these neglected tropical diseases requires direct targeting of mosquitoes. Therefore, enormous efforts have been made to develop effective repellents and/or larvicides against arthropods. The synthetic repellent DEET (N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide, formerly N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide) has been widely used. DEET is thought to work by blocking the insect's odorant receptors (olfactory receptor, ORx), which detect l-octen-3-ol, found in human breath and sweat, and not block the insect's ability to detect carbon dioxide [[16]]. However, the use of DEET has raised several concerns in terms of environmental and human health risks, especially in children [[17]]. Thus, plant essential oils (EOs) with good repellent properties and low toxicities to the environment and humans have been considered as an alternative to conventional synthetic insecticides [[18], [19]].

Plant EOs are volatile mixtures of organic compounds: in particular, mixtures of terpenoids and related aromatic compounds, which are secondary plant metabolites [[20]]. More than 3,000 EOs from various plants have been analyzed thus far, and approximately 10% of them are commercially available as potential repellents and insecticides [[21], [22]]. The chemical constituents of EOs are responsible for their antioxidative, antimicrobial, and pharmaceutical effects, as well as repellent and insecticidal effects [[23][26]].

This review focuses on recent studies that investigated EOs as insect repellents, exploring the relationships between the chemical ingredients and the repellent efficacy. Current technology and research trends to develop novel, effective, and safe insect repellents from plant EOs are also described. The articles discussed in this review were obtained via searching, until June 2018, major databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, with “essential oils,” “repellent/repellency,” and “arbovirus/arthropods” as keywords. A PubMed search for articles published from 1990 to June 2018, with terms related to repellent effect of EOs against arthropods, showed that there was a marked increase in the number of studies on finding natural alternatives to synthetic repellents, as evidenced by the drastic increase in the number of publications every 10 years (from 28 in 1990–1999, to 152 in 2000–2009, and to 412 in 2010–2018 September). The evidence obtained from these studies offers new perspectives to regulate hazardous arthropod vectors and control of the spread of severe neglected diseases among humans worldwide.

2. Essential Oils and Insect Repellents

A repellent is generally defined as a substance that discourages arthropods from landing or biting human skin [[10]]. The attractants for female mosquitoes include carbon dioxide and lactic acid present in sweat, and the resulting odor is recognized by chemoreceptors present in their antennae [[27]]. Insects detect specific scents via odorant receptors (ORx), which form complexes with coreceptors (Orco) that act as ion channels. When an odorant binds to an ORx, the Orco ion channel is opened, ultimately activating a sensory neuron that detects the odor [[28]]. Therefore, allosteric agonists and antagonists that target ORx and Orco could act as potential repellents by disrupting the odor-sensing activity in insects. Repellents, such as DEET, IR3535, and picaridin, have been proposed to act as olfactory agonists or antagonists, via modulating ORx activity, in the absence and presence of indole and octanol, which are specific to these ORx [[29], [30]]. There are various suggestions for the mode of action of insect repellency; however, the underlying mechanisms of insect repellency are not clear, and it is still a controversial topic [[31]]. Understanding the mode of action of insect repellents and how repellents modulate odor-sensing will allow us to design and develop better repellent formulations.

EOs are complex mixtures of volatile organic compounds from plants. The presence of monoterpenoids, sesquiterpenes, and alcohols has been proven to attribute to the repellent properties of EOs [[32], [33]]. In particular, citronellol, citronellal, α-pinene, and limonene are common constituents of many EOs exhibiting repellent effects [[19], [34]]. Recent evidence has shown that the odorant receptor neuron in a mosquito's antennal sensilla is activated by linalool, a naturally occurring terpene alcohol found in many flowers and spice plants, and by eucalyptol, a natural organic compound [[28], [31]]. The repellent screen platform based on odor-sensing might be new strategy for developing novel repellents or compounds with novel mode of action against arthropods.

3. Current Technologies for the Development of Effective and Safe Repellents Based on Essential Oils

3.1. Synergistic Interaction

Many methods have been described for the improvement of repellent efficacies of EOs. The most cited general method to increase the effectiveness of a repellent is to combine several EOs from different plants, leading to a synergistic effect [[35][40]]. The synergistic use of various components has been reported to provide a higher repellent activity than that obtained with single isolated components. A mixture of sesquiterpenes and monoterpenes present in different EOs was found to efficiently enhance the repellent effect, comparable to the effect of the sum of the individual components [[37]]. Mixtures of EOs derived from L. cubeba, L. salicifolia, and M. leucadendron led to a much stronger escape response by Ae. aegypti than each separate single EO [[39]]. EOs from Cryptomeria japonica were more effective against Ae. aegypti larvae than the combined major constituents including 16-kaurene and elemol. In addition, the minor compounds, including 3-carene, terpinolene, and α-terpinene, exhibited superior larvicidal activity against mosquito larvae [[2], [40]]. However, in some cases, the repellent effects of a mixture of synthetic pure compounds were not higher than those of a single compound. Moreover, synthetic blends formulated with major components of EOs had much lower repellent effects than their corresponding EOs [[41], [42]]. Interestingly, according to the reports on combined toxicity of Manuka, oregano, and clove bud EOs and their components against mosquito larvae, an antagonistic interaction between Manuka and clove bud EOs was reported, whereas a synergistic interaction between Manuka and oregano EOs occurred [[21]]. Carvacrol has been proposed to contribute to the synergistic interaction between Manuka and oregano EOs, whereas eugenol contributed to the antagonistic interaction between Manuka and clove bud EOs [[21]]. Taken together, these findings suggest that minor ingredients might play a major role in modulating repellent efficacy, suggesting the importance of compositional complexity in expressing repellency [[43], [44]].

3.2. Current and Emerging Technology

A variety of EOs have significant repellent effects; however, the effects tend to dissipate quickly due to their high volatility. EOs generally act in the vapor phase [[45], [46]], being active only for a short period of time. For example, citronella oil is highly volatile, and thus, insect repellents with citronella oil as the major component need to be reapplied every 20–60 minutes [[47], [48]]. The commercial citronella mosquito repellent contains up to 64% of the naturally occurring constituent p-menthane-3,8-diol (PMD), which is primarily responsible for the efficacy and protection against insects and biting arthropods [[10], [31]]. The drawback of the short protection time could be improved via formulation technology development, by retaining the active components on the skin for longer periods. Cream-based formulations and polymer mixture-based formulations led to an increase in the repellent effect. A topical formulation of lemon grass oil prepared in petroleum jelly base resulted in long-lasting protection, without side effects [[49]].

Moreover, microencapsulation resulted in an increase in repellency duration [[50], [51]], via controlled release of the EOs. Microencapsulation of Z. limonella oil in glutaraldehyde crosslinked gelatin enhanced the repellent effect against mosquitos [[52]]. Microcapsules containing thyme oil prepared by using a melamine–formaldehyde prepolymer showed sustained release properties and long‐lasting repellency of the encapsulated EO [[53]].

Interestingly, an increase in repellent efficiency was also reported when fixative agents including vanillin, liquid paraffin, and salicyluric acid were used. The most widely used fixative agent is vanillin [[54]], and the duration of repellency against arthropods including Ae. aegypti by EOs was notably enhanced when vanillin was mixed with the EOs. Upon adding vanillin, the protection time of Zanthoxylum piperitum oil and Citronella oil was extended to 2.5 h and 4.8 h, respectively [[53]]. In addition, microencapsulation or nanoemulsification combined with vanillin treatment enhanced the effects and protection times of repellents. The success of geranium EOs against Culex pipiens can be attributed to the microemulsion formulations prepared based on nonionic surfactants such as Tween 80 [[55][58]].

Currently, nanotechnology is extensively used to prepare repellents with EOs for better efficacy [[59]]. Nanoparticle fabrication by using plant components as reducing and stabilizing agents has several advantages compared with conventional methods. Nanoparticles can penetrate through the exoskeleton and interact with functional biomolecules, resulting in the disturbance in membrane permeability and proton motive force [[60], [61]]. The size, shape, and efficacy of nanoparticles against arthropods vary depending on the plant sources used as reducing and stabilizing agents. For example, silver nanoparticles containing neem were mostly spherical [[62], [63]], whereas silver nanoparticles fabricated using leaves from Carissa spinarum were cubical [[64][66]]. In addition, the use of nanotechnology for EO delivery could reduce the cost, steps for development process, and risks associated with pressure, temperature, and energy [[67]].

Recently, an EO-based polymeric patch, embedded into ethylcellulose and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVPK-30) polymers, was developed, and the physicochemical properties and efficiency of oil release against A. albopictus were assessed [[56]]. Notably, the EO repellent patch formulation was found to be safe in animal models in terms of respiratory, hematological, and biochemical parameters. Thus, the matrix-type patch formulation of the repellents seems to be an effective approach to deliver repellents into the surrounding environment. In addition, the mosquito repellent activity of cotton, functionalized with inclusion complexes of β-cyclodextrin citrate and EOs, was also measured against Anopheles stephensi. Peppermint and lavender were effective as potential repellents in cotton with inclusion complexes of β-cyclodextrin [[68]]. Currently, eco-friendly and cost-effective EOs with antiviral capacity against arboviruses such as Ross River virus (RRV) are being studied [[69]]. Three EOs from Cymbopogon citratus (CC), Pelargonium graveolens (PG), and Vetiveria zizanioides (VZ) with repellent activities were evaluated for antiviral effects, in terms of prevention of viral entry, using a wild-type RRV-T48 strain, and viral replication, using a recombinant RRV expressing Ren luciferase.

Codelivery of piperonyl butoxide (PBO) and 35 EOs along with permethrin, a common synthetic pyrethroid, was reported to determine whether the EOs could increase the effect of permethrin against Ae. aegypti and Anopheles gambiae [[70]]. The results suggested that the EOs elevated the efficacy of permethrin than that of PBO and thus can be used as a natural alternative to classic chemical synergists such as PBO [[70]]. Moreover, diverse EOs and EO terpenoids have been shown to provide synergistic effect with permethrin against arthropods [[71][73]], although the underlying mechanism is not clear. Further investigations are required to clarify the role of individual terpenoids and their capability to upregulate permethrin efficacy.

In addition, quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) could be applied for novel repellent development. QSAR is based on the differences in the physicochemical properties, including lipophilicity, shape index, and electrostatic nature, of terpenoids, which serve as a backbone for the synthesis of novel repellents. The QSAR approach might contribute to a better understanding of structural properties of terpenoids suitable for repellency, as well as predicting the repellent efficacy of other terpenoids [[74], [75]]. Recently, the larvicidal activity of fifty constituents of various EOs was evaluated against Culex quinquefasciatus Say using QSAR models in order to identify molecular and structural properties for larvicidal activity. In this study, molecular docking on the SCP-2 protein by α-humulene and β-caryophyllene was proposed to clarify the mechanism of action. This can be useful for designing and synthesizing new larvicidal agents [[76]]. Currently, a new technology has been applied to measure the toxicity of plant phytochemicals, using random amplified polymorphic DNA-polymerase chain reaction (RAPD-PCR). This technique is used for large-scale analysis of multiple samples for measuring the effects of genotoxic chemicals. Thus, RAPD-PCR technique can be used to evaluate the toxicity of repellents in biological systems by studying genomic DNA damage and mutation. To evaluate the toxic effects, as well as genotoxic hazards, of three plant oils and a recommended insecticide (Chlorpyrifos) against R. dominica adults, RAPD-PCR has been previously used [[77]].

Recent rapid progress in biotechnology has led to a massive increase in the use of multiomics tools including genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics data. However, these tools have not been utilized to find novel and more effective insect repellents. In fact, as the number of disease-causing viruses is increasing, it is necessary to use these data to a maximum extent to develop highly effective and useful repellents [[32]]. EOs with diverse constituent chemicals show severe complexities, and thus new technological approaches are required to understand the complex and diverse properties of EOs to treat neglected diseases [[33], [34]].

Interestingly, gene expression studies associated with molecular pathway analysis and transcriptome analysis using RNA-seq have been conducted to evaluate the effects of a large panel of EOs on the transcriptional landscape of human cells [[78], [79]]. In addition, emerging application of microarray-based gene expression profiling and pathway-based testing of chemicals [[60], [80][82]] could be utilized for toxicity pathway-based tests of new types of EOs against insect vectors. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis was used to analyze the effects and the potential toxicities of rosemary oil and orange oil [[83]], which can be applied to develop insect repellents. The signaling pathway-based evaluation and the assessment of potential risks of the phytochemicals, based on the representative chemical components associated with beneficial effects, were achieved by using DNA microarray assay [[84]]. The pathway-based evaluation of the beneficial effects and potential risks by means of multiomics technology seems to be promising for finding novel EO-based repellents. The emerging application of novel technology has entered a new era associated with recent innovations in insect repellent development.

4. Toxicity and Safety of EOs as Repellents against Arthropods

In general, plant EOs are recognized as safe; however, some of them also cause side effects such as skin irritation, mainly due to the constituents present in the plant EOs, limiting their extensive usage [[85], [86]]. Natural products are not always safer than synthetic ones, and some might cause adverse reactions. Moreover, sometimes, the available toxicity and safety information is limited and contradictory [[31], [87]]. The repellent effects of EOs from Rosmarinus officinalis, Dacrydium franklinii, and Melaleuca bracteata were found to be promising, but were unsuitable for human use because they caused skin irritation, contact dermatitis, and asthma [[18], [88][90]]. At present, synthetic repellents are more widely used than EOs, although this raises several concerns related to environmental and human health.

In the United States, the FDA tests and approves topical insect repellants such as DEET for use [[10]]. Further, citronella, lemon, and eucalyptus oils are common insect repellents and are registered by the EPA and have been approved for topical use in humans. PMD (p-menthane-3,8-diol), proven safe to human health, is the only plant-based repellent advocated by the CDC for public use. 2-Undecanone, a natural compound from the wild tomato plant Lycopersicon hirsutum, is a biopesticide product with lesser toxicity than conventional pesticides. BioUD formula is the only EPA-registered insect repellent containing 2-undecanone [[91]]. Natural EOs such as lemongrass, citronella, cedar, peppermint, lavender, and geranium oils are exempted from the Environmental Protection Agency registration. The duration of effectiveness of these oils is estimated to be between 30 minutes and 2 hours. An overview of comprehensive properties of commercially available repellents is described in Table 1. The general properties, toxicity, and safety of major conventional repellent EOs are described below.

Citronella. Citronella (3,7-dimethyloct-6-en-1-al), from Cymbopogon citratus, or lemon grass oil, has been used as a topical insect repellent in children and other sensitive populations under the US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) guidance with appropriate precautionary labeling [[96], [97]]. Moreover, the US FDA (Food & Drug Administration) considers citronella oil as GRAS. Citronella can deter mosquito biting for 2 hours, showing lesser effectiveness than DEET in terms of duration of protection against mosquito bite. However, recently, citronella is not being used as an insect repellent in Canada and Europe. The Canadian regulatory concerns with citronella as an insect repellent are due to a lack of safety data and the presence of methyl eugenol [[98]]. Methyl eugenol is categorized as a group 2B substance, possibly carcinogenic to humans, by the IARC (2013), as there is sufficient evidence in experimental animals indicating carcinogenicity, although no data are available for humans. In addition, methyl eugenol is “reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen” by the US National Toxicology Program (NTP), due to its carcinogenicity in other rodents, but not in rats. In addition, citronella oil is regarded as a category 3 substance, with some safety concerns regarding the presence of methyl eugenol, and is not sold as an insect repellent within the EU since 2006 [[98]].

Clove Oil. Clove oil, from Syzygium aromaticum, Eugenia caryophyllata, or Eugenia aromaticum, has been widely used in food, cosmetics, and medicines, as well as in insect repellents. However, some reports have raised concerns that methyl eugenol, one of the trace components of clove oil, could be a carcinogen. The major components of clove oil are eugenol, eugenol acetate, and caryophyllene. Clove oil was approved by the FDA under its Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 21 as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) and can be added directly to human food (21 CFR 184.1257) in both natural and synthetic forms. In addition, clove oil was approved for use in dentistry as an analgesic and in dental cements, as a fragrance in personal care and aromatherapy products, and in transdermal drug delivery systems by the FDA. The US EPA also categorized clove oil under the Section 25(b) list of Minimum Risk Pesticides, being exempt from most pesticide registration requirements, including extensive toxicity testing. However, the US National Library of Medicine reported some side effects of clove oil, including skin irritation, headache, and increased bleeding due to decreased blood clotting. In conclusion, eugenol or clove oil use may be safe, and its carcinogenic potential or other adverse effects need to be established scientifically.

PMD. PMD (p-menthane-3,8-diol) is a major repellent ingredient extracted from the leaves of lemon eucalyptus, Eucalyptus citriodora, or Corymbia citriodora. It can be chemically synthesized for use in commercial repellents. Citronellol, limonene, and linalool were found in the extracts from eucalyptus, together with PMD. PMD is a highly effective and long-acting mosquito repellent, similar to DEET. Moreover, PMD exhibited better protection against ticks than DEET, by inhibiting attachment and blood-feeding of tick vectors associated with Lyme disease and Rocky Mountain spotted fever [[10]].

EPA has registered the oil of lemon eucalyptus (OLE) or PMD as a biopesticide repellent, under repellents derived from natural materials in 2000. However, “pure” oil of lemon eucalyptus, EO not formulated as a repellent, is not recommended as an insect repellent by the EPA, as there are no studies on its safety and efficacy. PMD is categorized as an eye irritant, but not classified as a skin sensitizer. PMD is classified under Toxicity Category I as a technical product and under Toxicity Category II as an end-use product. Products containing PMD must carry a “warning” label, because it may cause eye irritation. Acute toxicity studies on PMD have shown low toxicity, but there are little epidemiologic data on the effects of PMD. PMD, as an active ingredient, is classified as GRAS by the EPA, is used to flavor foods and medicines, and is a component of many consumer products. The FDA has recommended that PMD not be used in children under 3 years of age. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention recommends the use of PMD products as they prevent mosquito bites.

Permethrin. Permethrin is one of the most common synthetic Type I pyrethroidal neurotoxic insecticides, obtained from the dried flowers of Chrysanthemum cinerariifolium. Its main mechanism of action is axonal sodium channel depolarization causing repetitive nerve impulses as a neurotoxin [[99]]. High-dose pyrethroids can affect gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-gated chloride channels, resulting in seizures with severe type II poisoning. Permethrin showed increased acute toxicity against cold-blooded organisms including insects compared to that against warm-blooded organisms including mammals. It showed minimal topical absorption with an approximate half-life of 70 days. Permethrin is recommended to be used as an insect repellent on clothing only and direct skin contact should be avoided. Permethrin-treated clothes were effective against insects for 2 weeks to 6 months (5–20 detergent washings). It can also be applied to bed nets and beddings with high-level protection against mosquitoes, ticks, and other insects [[10]]. Human exposure to large doses of permethrin may cause genotoxicity and immunotoxicity in humans and farm animals. However, it is classified by the EPA as a likely human carcinogen, based on a mouse reproduction test.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

The wide use of synthetic repellents against arthropods has raised some issues on safety and health risks to humans and the environment. Thus, EOs from plants could be considered as alternatives to synthetic repellents. At present, the development of natural product-based repellents with more effective and long-lasting protection is required. The recent rapid progress in the field of biotechnology might ensure the development of natural repellents with improved repellency, long-lasting protection, and enhanced safety. In particular, current formulation technology and nanotechnology might accelerate the emergence of novel and effective EOs with long-lasting repellency effects. Moreover, toxicological studies associated with multiomics can also be applied to find novel repellents, monitor target exposure to repellents, track cellular responses to different doses, assess mechanisms of action, and predict health risks associated with existing and newly developed EOs.



This study was supported by Soonchunhyang University.


  1. L. BraackA. P. Gouveia De AlmeidaA. J. CornelR. SwanepoelC. De JagerMosquito-borne arboviruses of African origin: Review of key viruses and vectorsParasites & Vectors20181112-s2.0-85040353426
  2. C. N. DiasD. F. C. MoraesEssential oils and their compounds as Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae) larvicides: reviewParasitology Research201411356559210.1007/s00436-013-3687-62-s2.0-8488773521424265058
  3. M. GovindarajanM. RajeswaryG. BenelliChemical composition, toxicity and non-target effects of Pinus kesiya essential oil: An eco-friendly and novel larvicide against malaria, dengue and lymphatic filariasis mosquito vectorsEcotoxicology and Environmental Safety201612985902-s2.0-8496113487410.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.03.00726995063
  4. R. MenesesR. E. OcazionezJ. R. MartínezE. E. StashenkoInhibitory effect of essential oils obtained from plants grown in Colombia on yellow fever virus replication in vitroAnnals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials20098, article no. 82-s2.0-6354910181510.1186/1476-0711-8-819267922
  5. E. GouldJ. PetterssonS. HiggsR. CharrelX. de LamballerieEmerging arboviruses: Why today?One Health201741132-s2.0-8502173417510.1016/j.onehlt.2017.06.00128785601
  6. B. ContiM. LeonardiL. PistelliR. ProfetiI. OuerghemmiG. BenelliLarvicidal and repellent activity of essential oils from wild and cultivated Ruta chalepensis L. (Rutaceae) against Aedes albopictus Skuse (Diptera: Culicidae), an arbovirus vectorParasitology Research201311239919992-s2.0-8487840463010.1007/s00436-012-3221-223224707
  7. A. M. PohlitA. R. RezendeE. L. Lopes BaldinN. P. LopesV. F. de Andrade NetoPlant extracts, isolated phytochemicals, and plant-derived agents which are lethal to arthropod vectors of human tropical diseases-a reviewPlanta Medica20117761863010.1055/s-0030-12709492-s2.0-7995272946021432748
  8. A. M. PohlitN. P. LopesR. A. GamaW. P. TadeiV. F. De Andrade NetoPatent literature on mosquito repellent inventions which contain plant essential oils - a reviewPlanta Medica201177659861710.1055/s-0030-12707232-s2.0-7995448723721328177
  9. I. AhronowitzM. T. OchoaRecognizing and preventing arbovirus infectionsCutis; Cutaneous Medicine for the Practitioner201710052943302-s2.0-85041668607
  10. J. H. DiazChemical and plant-based insect repellents: Efficacy, safety, and toxicityWilderness & Environmental Medicine20162711531632-s2.0-8495947910110.1016/j.wem.2015.11.00726827259
  11. M. GovindarajanG. BenelliEco-friendly larvicides from Indian plants: Effectiveness of lavandulyl acetate and bicyclogermacrene on malaria, dengue and Japanese encephalitis mosquito vectorsEcotoxicology and Environmental Safety20161333954022-s2.0-8498272061510.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.07.03527504617
  12. V. TyagiLaboratory evaluation of certain essential oils for their lavicidal activity against Aedes albopictus, vector of dengue and ChikungunyaGlobal Journal of Zoology20161100300610.17352/gjz.000002
  13. J. D. StanawayD. S. ShepardE. A. UndurragaThe global burden of dengue: an analysis from the global burden of disease study 2013The Lancet Infectious Diseases201616671272326874619
  14. D. WeetmanB. KamgangA. BadoloAedes mosquitoes and Aedes-borne arboviruses in Africa: Current and future threatsInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health20181522-s2.0-85041477528
  15. A. MysterudV. M. StigumI. V. SelandTick abundance, pathogen prevalence, and disease incidence in two contrasting regions at the northern distribution range of EuropeParasites Vectors2018111
  16. D. R. SwaleB. SunF. TongJ. R. BloomquistNeurotoxicity and mode of action of N, N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET)PLoS ONE2014982-s2.0-84905457077
  17. B. KhanikorP. ParidaR. N. S. YadavD. BoraComparative mode of action of some terpene compounds against octopamine receptor and acetyl cholinesterase of mosquito and human system by the help of homology modeling and docking studiesJournal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science2013326122-s2.0-8487605262410.7324/JAPS.2013.30202
  18. L. S. NerioJ. Olivero-VerbelE. StashenkoRepellent activity of essential oils: a reviewBioresource Technology2010101137237810.1016/j.biortech.2009.07.0482-s2.0-7024913911019729299
  19. F. TongJ. R. BloomquistPlant essential oils affect the toxicities of carbaryl and permethrin against aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)Journal of Medical Entomology201350482683210.1603/ME130022-s2.0-8488043478923926781
  20. M. F. MaiaS. J. MoorePlant-based insect repellents: a review of their efficacy, development and testingMalaria Journal2011101, article S1110.1186/1475-2875-10-S1-S112-s2.0-79952757129
  21. E. J. MuturiJ. L. RamirezK. M. DollM. J. BowmanCombined toxicity of three essential oils against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) larvaeJournal of Medical Entomology20175461684169110.1093/jme/tjx1682-s2.0-8503801752429029151
  22. J. Sharifi-RadA. SuredaG. C. TenoreBiological activities of essential oils: From plant chemoecology to traditional healing systemsMolecules2017221, article no. 702-s2.0-8500945834610.3390/molecules22010070
  23. E. LupiC. HatzP. SchlagenhaufThe efficacy of repellents against Aedes, Anopheles, Culex and Ixodes spp. - A literature reviewTravel Medicine and Infectious Disease20131163744112-s2.0-8488965494510.1016/j.tmaid.2013.10.00524201040
  24. K. KalaivaniS. Senthil-NathanA. G. MurugesanBiological activity of selected Lamiaceae and Zingiberaceae plant essential oils against the dengue vector Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae)Parasitology Research20121103126112682-s2.0-8486273300510.1007/s00436-011-2623-x21881945
  25. M. ChellappandianP. Vasantha-SrinivasanS. Senthil-NathanBotanical essential oils and uses as mosquitocides and repellents against dengueEnvironment International20181132142302-s2.0-8504189840810.1016/j.envint.2017.12.03829453089
  26. T. Mihajilov-KrstevB. JovanovićJ. JovićAntimicrobial, antioxidative, and insect repellent effects of Artemisia absinthium essential oilPlanta Medica20148018169817052-s2.0-8491934672210.1055/s-0034-138318225317772
  27. T. KröberS. KesslerJ. FreiM. BourquinP. M. GuerinAn in vitro assay for testing mosquito repellents employing a warm body and carbon dioxide as a behavioral activatorJournal of the American Mosquito Control Association20102643813862-s2.0-7865040865810.2987/10-6044.121290933
  28. R. W. TaylorI. M. RomaineC. LiuStructure-activity relationship of a broad-spectrum insect odorant receptor agonistACS Chemical Biology2012710164716522-s2.0-8486781541410.1021/cb300331z22924767
  29. J. D. BohbotJ. C. DickensInsect repellents: Modulators of mosquito odorant receptor activityPLoS ONE2010582-s2.0-77957869682
  30. P. TsitouraK. KoussisK. IatrouInhibition of Anopheles gambiae odorant receptor function by mosquito repellentsThe Journal of Biological Chemistry201529012796179722-s2.0-8492530871710.1074/jbc.M114.63229925657000
  31. J. C. DickensJ. D. BohbotMini review: Mode of action of mosquito repellentsPesticide Biochemistry and Physiology201310631491552-s2.0-8487988654410.1016/j.pestbp.2013.02.006
  32. S. SathantriphopN. L. AcheeU. SanguanpongT. ChareonviriyaphapThe effects of plant essential oils on escape response and mortality rate of Aedes aegypti and Anopheles minimusJournal of Vector Ecology20154023183262-s2.0-8494793611710.1111/jvec.1217026611967
  33. D. SritabutraM. SoonweraRepellent activity of herbal essential oils against Aedes aegypti (Linn.) and Culex quinquefasciatus (Say.)Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease2013342712762-s2.0-8488057753210.1016/S2222-1808(13)60069-9
  34. M. Soleimani-AhmadiS. M. AbtahiA. MadaniPhytochemical profile and mosquito larvicidal activity of the essential oil from aerial parts of Satureja bachtiarica Bunge against malaria and lymphatic filariasis vectorsJournal of Essential Oil Bearing Plants201720232833610.1080/0972060X.2017.13059192-s2.0-85018664959
  35. J. H. TakE. JovelM. B. IsmanComparative and synergistic activity of Rosmarinus officinalis L. essential oil constituents against the larvae and an ovarian cell line of the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)Pest Management Science201672347448010.1002/ps.40102-s2.0-8492865252725809531
  36. R. HarrisSynergism in the essential oil worldInternational Journal of Aromatherapy20021241791862-s2.0-003698105010.1016/S0962-4562(02)00083-8
  37. S. MulyaningsihF. SporerS. ZimmermannJ. ReichlingM. WinkSynergistic properties of the terpenoids aromadendrene and 1,8-cineole from the essential oil of Eucalyptus globulus against antibiotic-susceptible and antibiotic-resistant pathogensPhytomedicine201017131061106610.1016/j.phymed.2010.06.0182-s2.0-7795779503220727725
  38. É. GyörgyStudy of the antimicrobial activity and synergistic effect of some plant extracts and essential oilsRevista Română de Medicină de Laborator20101814956
  39. A. NoosidumT. ChareonviriyaphapA. ChandrapatyaSynergistic repellent and irritant effect of combined essential oils on Aedes aegypti (L.) mosquitoesJournal of Vector Ecology20143922983052-s2.0-8490997204710.1111/jvec.1210425424258
  40. S. S. ChengM. T. ChuaE. H. ChangC. G. HuangW. J. ChenS. T. ChangVariations in insecticidal activity and chemical compositions of leaf essential oils from Cryptomeria japonica at different agesBioresource Technology2009100146547010.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.0602-s2.0-5134916140918178080
  41. J. U. RehmanA. AliI. A. KhanPlant based products: Use and development as repellents against mosquitoes: A reviewFitoterapia20149565742-s2.0-8489705452110.1016/j.fitote.2014.03.00224631763
  42. N. TabancaZ. AliU. R. BernierBioassay-guided isolation and identification of Aedes aegypti larvicidal and biting deterrent compounds from Veratrum lobelianumOpen Chemistry201816132433210.1515/chem-2018-0030
  43. A. ThomasH. D. MazigoA. ManjuranoD. MoronaE. J. KwekaEvaluation of active ingredients and larvicidal activity of clove and cinnamon essential oils against Anopheles gambiae (sensu lato)Parasites & Vectors20171012-s2.0-85028892727
  44. R. TisgratogU. SanguanpongJ. P. GriecoR. Ngoen-KluanT. ChareonviriyaphapPlants traditionally used as mosquito repellents and the implication for their use in vector controlActa Tropica20161571361442-s2.0-8496087505010.1016/j.actatropica.2016.01.02426826392
  45. J. IslamK. ZamanS. DuarahP. S. RajuP. ChattopadhyayMosquito repellents: An insight into the chronological perspectives and novel discoveriesActa Tropica20171672162302-s2.0-8500865599710.1016/j.actatropica.2016.12.03128040483
  46. O. GnankinéI. L. H. N. BassoléEssential oils as an alternative to pyrethroids’ resistance against anopheles species complex giles (Diptera: Culicidae)Molecules201722102-s2.0-85032965085
  47. P. PrabakaranC. SivasubramanianR. VeeramaniS. PrabhuReview study on larvicidal and mosquito repellent activity of volatile oils isolated from medicinal plantsInternational Journal of Environment, Agriculture and Biotechnology2017263132313810.22161/ijeab/2.6.46
  48. N. RíosE. E. StashenkoJ. E. DuqueEvaluation of the insecticidal activity of essential oils and their mixtures against Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)Revista Brasileira de Entomologia20176143073112-s2.0-8503139941410.1016/j.rbe.2017.08.005
  49. A. O. OyedeleA. A. GboladeM. B. SosanF. B. AdewoyinO. L. SoyeluO. O. OrafidiyaFormulation of an effective mosquito-repellent topical product from lemongrass oilPhytomedicine2002932592622-s2.0-003625028110.1078/0944-7113-0012012046869
  50. N. MisniZ. M. NorR. AhmadRepellent effect of microencapsulated essential oil in lotion formulation against mosquito bitesJournal of Vector Borne Diseases201754144532-s2.0-8501639461628352045
  51. H. WuC. C. FuD. D. YuJ. T. FengX. ZhangZ. Q. MaRepellent activity screening of 11 kinds of essential oils against Aedes albopictus Skuse: Microcapsule preparation of Herba Schizonepetae oil and repellent bioassay on hand skinTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene2013107847147910.1093/trstmh/trt0452-s2.0-8488758859123740242
  52. T. K. MajiM. R. HussainMicroencapsulation of zanthoxylum limonella oil (ZLO) in genipin crosslinked chitosan-gelatin complex for mosquito repellent applicationJournal of Applied Polymer Science200911127797852-s2.0-58449102749
  53. S. K. ChungJ. Y. SeoJ. H. LimH. H. ParkM. J. YeaH. J. ParkMicroencapsulation of essential oil for insect repellent in food packaging systemJournal of Food Science2013785E709E7142-s2.0-8487760173910.1111/1750-3841.1211123551154
  54. S. SongkroM. JenboonlapM. BoonprasertponD. ManeenuanK. BoukingN. KaewnopparatEffects of glucam P-20, vanillin, and fixolide on mosquito repellency of citronella oil lotionsJournal of Medical Entomology201249367267710.1603/ME111412-s2.0-8486115914922679876
  55. O. CampoloA. CherifM. RicuperoAuthor Correction: Citrus peel essential oil nanoformulations to control the tomato borer, Tuta absoluta: chemical properties and biological activityScientific Reports20188110.1038/s41598-018-28931-8
  56. P. ChattopadhyayS. DhimanS. BorahB. RabhaA. K. ChaurasiaV. VeerEssential oil based polymeric patch development and evaluating its repellent activity against mosquitoesActa Tropica201514745532-s2.0-8492841272610.1016/j.actatropica.2015.03.02725861938
  57. A. R. MontefuscoliJ. O. Werdin GonzálezS. D. PalmaA. A. FerreroB. Fernández BandDesign and development of aqueous nanoformulations for mosquito controlParasitology Research201411327938002-s2.0-8490336288510.1007/s00436-013-3710-y24292544
  58. O. NuchuchuaU. SakulkuN. UawongyartS. PuttipipatkhachornA. SoottitantawatU. RuktanonchaiIn vitro characterization and mosquito (Aedes aegypti) repellent activity of essential-oils-loaded nanoemulsionsAAPS PharmSciTech2009104123412422-s2.0-7554909134810.1208/s12249-009-9323-119862624
  59. G. BenelliA. CaselliA. CanaleNanoparticles for mosquito control: Challenges and constraintsJournal of King Saud University - Science201729442443510.1016/j.jksus.2016.08.0062-s2.0-84994804573
  60. X. ValentiniL. AbsilG. LaurentToxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles on the NRK52E renal cell lineMolecular & Cellular Toxicology20171344194312-s2.0-8503990246610.1007/s13273-017-0046-1
  61. G. BenelliMode of action of nanoparticles against insectsEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research International20182513123291234129611126
  62. K. MuruganD. DineshM. PaulpandiNanoparticles in the fight against mosquito-borne diseases: bioactivity of Bruguiera cylindrica-synthesized nanoparticles against dengue virus DEN-2 (in vitro) and its mosquito vector Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)Parasitology Research201511412434943612-s2.0-8494365805810.1007/s00436-015-4676-826290219
  63. A. VermaM. S. MehataControllable synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Neem leaves and their antimicrobial activityJournal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences20169110911510.1016/j.jrras.2015.11.001
  64. M. GovindarajanM. RajeswaryK. VeerakumarU. MuthukumaranS. L. HotiG. BenelliGreen synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles fabricated using Anisomeles indica: Mosquitocidal potential against malaria, dengue and Japanese encephalitis vectorsExperimental Parasitology2016161404710.1016/j.exppara.2015.12.0112-s2.0-8495193713426708933
  65. M. GovindarajanG. BenelliFacile biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Barleria cristata: mosquitocidal potential and biotoxicity on three non-target aquatic organismsParasitology Research201611539259352-s2.0-8495914684610.1007/s00436-015-4817-026555876
  66. M. GovindarajanG. BenelliA facile one-pot synthesis of eco-friendly nanoparticles using Carissa carandas: Ovicidal and larvicidal potential on malaria, dengue and filariasis mosquito vectorsJournal of Cluster Science2017281153610.1007/s10876-016-1035-62-s2.0-84975472701
  67. H. G. ParkM. K. YeoNanomaterial regulatory policy for human health and environmentMolecular & Cellular Toxicology2016123223236
  68. S. KhannaJ. N. ChakrabortyMosquito repellent activity of cotton functionalized with inclusion complexes of β-cyclodextrin citrate and essential oilsFashion and Textiles20185110.1186/s40691-017-0125-x
  69. M. RalambondrainyE. BelarbiW. ViranaickenIn vitro comparison of three common essential oils mosquito repellents as inhibitors of the Ross River virusPLoS ONE201813510.1371/journal.pone.0196757
  70. A. D. GrossE. J. NorrisM. J. KimberL. C. BartholomayJ. R. CoatsEssential oils enhance the toxicity of permethrin against Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiaeMedical and Veterinary Entomology201731155622-s2.0-8499745680210.1111/mve.1219727800630
  71. Y. TrongtokitY. RongsriyamN. KomalamisraC. ApiwathnasornComparative repellency of 38 essential oils against mosquito bitesPhytotherapy Research20051943033092-s2.0-2324444396810.1002/ptr.163716041723
  72. V. TyagiJ. IslamA. AgnihotriRepellent efficacy of some essential oils against Aedes albopictusJournal of Parasitic Diseases: Diagnosis and Therapy201611
  73. N. FaraoneN. K. HillierG. C. CutlerPlant essential oils synergize and antagonize toxicity of different conventional insecticides against Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae)PLoS ONE20151052-s2.0-84930226861
  74. H. J. ChangH. J. KimH. S. ChunQuantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) for neuroprotective activity of terpenoidsLife Sciences200780983584110.1016/j.lfs.2006.11.0092-s2.0-3384655489417166521
  75. Y. CaiE. BagyinszkyS. S. A. AnS. Y. KimIn silico modeling of pathogenic or possibly pathogenic point mutations in PSEN2Molecular & Cellular Toxicology20161244534642-s2.0-8500847300810.1007/s13273-016-0050-x
  76. S. Andrade-OchoaJ. Correa-BasurtoL. M. Rodríguez-ValdezL. E. Sánchez-TorresB. Nogueda-TorresG. V. Nevárez-MoorillónIn vitro and in silico studies of terpenes, terpenoids and related compounds with larvicidal and pupaecidal activity against Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae)Chemistry Central Journal201812110.1186/s13065-018-0425-2
  77. S. H. QariN. A. Abdel-FattahGenotoxic studies of selected plant oil extracts onJournal of Taibah University for Science201811347848610.1016/j.jtusci.2016.09.010
  78. J. PlantB. StephensEffects of essential oils on transcriptional regulation in human cellsMedicinal Aromatic Plants201543
  79. M. LiaoJ. J. XiaoL. J. ZhouInsecticidal activity of Melaleuca alternifolia essential oil and RNA-Seq analysis of Sitophilus zeamais transcriptome in response to oil fumigationPLoS One20161112
  80. H. S. KimH. J. LeeY. J. KimW. H. JangY. R. SeoA toxicogenomic study for the investigation of genotoxicity-related signaling networks in long-term and low dose lead exposed rat kidneyMolecular & Cellular Toxicology20161244374452-s2.0-8500846215110.1007/s13273-016-0048-4
  81. W. LeeI. KimS. ShinExpression profiling of microRNAs in lipopolysaccharide-induced acute lung injury after hypothermia treatmentMolecular & Cellular Toxicology20161232432532-s2.0-8499089543110.1007/s13273-016-0029-7
  82. Y. J. KimN. LeeS. WooJ. C. RyuS. YumTranscriptomic change as evidence for cadmium-induced endocrine disruption in marine fish model of medaka, Oryzias javanicusMolecular & Cellular Toxicology201612440942010.1007/s13273-016-0045-72-s2.0-85008474388
  83. X. HanT. L. ParkerEssential oils diversely modulate genome-wide gene expression in human dermal fibroblastsCogent Medicine20174130759110.1080/2331205X.2017.1307591
  84. R. KiyamaDNA microarray-based screening and characterization of traditional Chinese medicineMicroarrays2017612-s2.0-85025447710
  85. G. BenelliR. PavelaBeyond mosquitoes-Essential oil toxicity and repellency against bloodsucking insectsIndustrial Crops and Products201811738239210.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.0722-s2.0-85044756141
  86. M. GovindarajanG. Benelliα-Humulene and β-elemene from Syzygium zeylanicum (Myrtaceae) essential oil: highly effective and eco-friendly larvicides against Anopheles subpictus, Aedes albopictus, and Culex tritaeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae)Parasitology Research20161157277127782-s2.0-8496220538610.1007/s00436-016-5025-227026503
  87. M. Cheraghi NiroumandM. H. FarzaeiE. E. Karimpour-RazkenariAn evidence-based review on medicinal plants used as insecticide and insect repellent in traditional Iranian medicineIranian Red Crescent Medical Journal20161822-s2.0-84956964570
  88. M. GovindarajanM. RajeswaryS. ArivoliS. TennysonG. BenelliLarvicidal and repellent potential of Zingiber nimmonii (J. Graham) Dalzell (Zingiberaceae) essential oil: an eco-friendly tool against malaria, dengue, and lymphatic filariasis mosquito vectors?Parasitology Research20161155180718162-s2.0-8495454608210.1007/s00436-016-4920-x26792432
  89. M. MiroddiG. CalapaiS. IsolaP. L. MinciulloS. GangemiRosmarinus officinalis L. as cause of contact dermatitisAllergologia et Immunopathologia20144266166192-s2.0-8492611714010.1016/j.aller.2013.04.00623827646
  90. M. GovindarajanM. RajeswaryS. L. HotiG. BenelliLarvicidal potential of carvacrol and terpinen-4-ol from the essential oil of Origanum vulgare (Lamiaceae) against Anopheles stephensi, Anopheles subpictus, Culex quinquefasciatus and Culex tritaeniorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae)Research in Veterinary Science201610477822-s2.0-8495770723510.1016/j.rvsc.2015.11.01126850541
  91. B. E. Witting-BissingerC. F. StumpfK. V. DonohueC. S. AppersonR. M. RoeNovel arthropod repellent, BioUD, is an efficacious alternative to DEETJournal of Medical Entomology200845589189810.1603/0022-2585(2008)45[891:NARBIA]2.0.CO;22-s2.0-5274909337418826032
  92. M. S. FradinJ. F. DayComparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bitesThe New England Journal of Medicine20023471131810.1056/nejmoa0116992-s2.0-003701932212097535
  93. K. Van RoeyM. SoknyL. DenisField evaluation of picaridin repellents reveals differences in repellent sensitivity between Southeast Asian vectors of malaria and arbovirusesPLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases20148122-s2.0-84928242297
  94. S. P. CarrollJ. LoyePMD, a registered botanical mosquito repellent with deet-like efficacyJournal of the American Mosquito Control Association20062235075142-s2.0-3375039310710.2987/8756-971X(2006)22[507:PARBMR]2.0.CO;217067054
  95. J. K. YoonK. C. KimY. ChoComparison of repellency effect of mosquito repellents for DEET, citronella, and fennel oilJournal of Parasitology Research20152015636102110.1155/2015/361021
  96. C. KongkaewI. SakunragN. ChaiyakunaprukA. TawatsinEffectiveness of citronella preparations in preventing mosquito bites: systematic review of controlled laboratory experimental studiesTropical Medicine & International Health201116780281010.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02781.x2-s2.0-7995881230521481108
  97. R. SharmaR. RaoS. KumarS. MahantS. KhatkarTherapeutic potential of citronella essential oil: a reviewCurrent Drug Discovery Technologies20181541570163810.2174/1570163815666180718095041
  98. K. H. TanR. NishidaMethyl eugenol: Its occurrence, distribution, and role in nature, especially in relation to insect behavior and pollinationJournal of Insect Science201212, article no. 562-s2.0-8486577957210.1673/031.012.560122963669
  99. B. DragoN. S. ShahS. H. ShahAcute permethrin neurotoxicity: Variable presentations, high index of suspicionToxicology Reports20141102610282-s2.0-8492274773610.1016/j.toxrep.2014.09.00728962315
The underlying source XML for this text is taken from The license for the article is Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. The main subject has been identified as viral infectious disease.